http://ift.tt/1rPTJGr
"Under the 2013 proposed regulations, in order to satisfy the statutory excepted benefits criterion that such benefits cannot otherwise be “an integral part of the plan,” participants must be able to decline coverage."
Before this final ruling came out, it seemed as if the EHB vision part of the ACA had to be embedded in the medical plan (hence there were no carriers selling stand along vision policies). It seems now as if people must have the choice to accept or decline their vision coverage.
Are we going to see carriers starting to sell stand alone ehb vision plans?
Am I reading this whole thing wrong?
"Under the 2013 proposed regulations, in order to satisfy the statutory excepted benefits criterion that such benefits cannot otherwise be “an integral part of the plan,” participants must be able to decline coverage."
Before this final ruling came out, it seemed as if the EHB vision part of the ACA had to be embedded in the medical plan (hence there were no carriers selling stand along vision policies). It seems now as if people must have the choice to accept or decline their vision coverage.
Are we going to see carriers starting to sell stand alone ehb vision plans?
Am I reading this whole thing wrong?
New ACA regs to impact EHB vision?
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire