In the future, couldn't we use technology to analyze our brains and determine:
-what percent of our human successes are driven by natural gifts we were born with,
-luck of circumstances we were born into "how much our parents invested into our education,
- how conductive to learning were our childhood environments"...vs how much strain did you put in
And equal opportunity of the new technology age can ultimately mean "equal strain of the human body equates equal payouts"?
And then we can have the machines redustribute wealth in such a way that down to a perfect science, the harder you bust your chops, no matter what it is you do, the more you earn?
The economic effect of this would be people would be rewarded for doing the jobs they really do not WANT to do, which would result in production quality decline as a short-term side effect...eventually offset by lower cost structures:
(at the same time, you would have the decline of consulting services, legal consultants, costs of outsourcing roles and responsibilities that would be natural skillsets inside the organizations)....diverse skillsets in all sectors of employment ...increased skillset varieties in all job positions from waste management to orthopedic surgeon
There would still be more money in FSAs and MDs and JDs and CPAs as the strain of exam passings would have a payout reward that is spread over many years after the exams are passed, as would any hard-earned graduate degree
In essence the machines would see the skipping of college to get money faster by say delivering mail or working as a garbage collector....as a "lazy" lack of strain on the brain you could have had....but the machines would lower the "lazy" score if the person was raised in a neighborhood deprived of the opprtunity to go to school
See where I'm getting?
And the current system of payouts would still heavily correlate to payouts received, even with the machine interventions in wealth distributions. If there is a supply shortage of say Computer engineers, market wages for these roles would still go up, but since the machine will ensure a poor guy from south Detroit who grew up in a rundown street who ached and toiled to become a computer engineer would get more actual distribution, you will see a changed dynamic of people due to payout adjustment
Similar to risk adjustment in HCR
-what percent of our human successes are driven by natural gifts we were born with,
-luck of circumstances we were born into "how much our parents invested into our education,
- how conductive to learning were our childhood environments"...vs how much strain did you put in
And equal opportunity of the new technology age can ultimately mean "equal strain of the human body equates equal payouts"?
And then we can have the machines redustribute wealth in such a way that down to a perfect science, the harder you bust your chops, no matter what it is you do, the more you earn?
The economic effect of this would be people would be rewarded for doing the jobs they really do not WANT to do, which would result in production quality decline as a short-term side effect...eventually offset by lower cost structures:
(at the same time, you would have the decline of consulting services, legal consultants, costs of outsourcing roles and responsibilities that would be natural skillsets inside the organizations)....diverse skillsets in all sectors of employment ...increased skillset varieties in all job positions from waste management to orthopedic surgeon
There would still be more money in FSAs and MDs and JDs and CPAs as the strain of exam passings would have a payout reward that is spread over many years after the exams are passed, as would any hard-earned graduate degree
In essence the machines would see the skipping of college to get money faster by say delivering mail or working as a garbage collector....as a "lazy" lack of strain on the brain you could have had....but the machines would lower the "lazy" score if the person was raised in a neighborhood deprived of the opprtunity to go to school
See where I'm getting?
And the current system of payouts would still heavily correlate to payouts received, even with the machine interventions in wealth distributions. If there is a supply shortage of say Computer engineers, market wages for these roles would still go up, but since the machine will ensure a poor guy from south Detroit who grew up in a rundown street who ached and toiled to become a computer engineer would get more actual distribution, you will see a changed dynamic of people due to payout adjustment
Similar to risk adjustment in HCR
Redefining "Equal Opportunity" in the future
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire