This may sound absolutely ludicrous but it can be arguably a healthy thing for a Govt to do in a free society, in an effort to enable the people at all wealth levels to feel empowered through a public mechanism to voice opposition to the status quo.
The idea is that though most organized dissent either otherwise
1) is born in affluent youth groups fed with a silver spoon alongside a small diverse bunch of lower income groups nearby under some form of university sponsorship program at a progressively liberal university
Or
2) is not a very organized protest voice upon which the dissent turns into a rave that is quickly shut down
Under the theory civilized dissent is healthy for a society with a minority voice but cannot be easily organized by the every day working family man and woman,
Could you see merit for a tax-payer-funded organized allotment to groups opposed to status quo political issues? To speak out against status quo protected by other tax-payer funded goods and services?
The idea is that though most organized dissent either otherwise
1) is born in affluent youth groups fed with a silver spoon alongside a small diverse bunch of lower income groups nearby under some form of university sponsorship program at a progressively liberal university
Or
2) is not a very organized protest voice upon which the dissent turns into a rave that is quickly shut down
Under the theory civilized dissent is healthy for a society with a minority voice but cannot be easily organized by the every day working family man and woman,
Could you see merit for a tax-payer-funded organized allotment to groups opposed to status quo political issues? To speak out against status quo protected by other tax-payer funded goods and services?
The case for Taxpayer-funded organized protests against taxpayer funded establishment
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire