SOA #197 and Spring 2007 #25
These are easy, right. Trips me up every time because when I calculate Z, I want to make n the number of years. So instead of 1/(1 + k) I put 2/(2+k) on the SOA one and 5/(5+k) in the 2007 one.
So, why is this done differently? What did I miss?
These are easy, right. Trips me up every time because when I calculate Z, I want to make n the number of years. So instead of 1/(1 + k) I put 2/(2+k) on the SOA one and 5/(5+k) in the 2007 one.
So, why is this done differently? What did I miss?
Semiparametric Buhlman
0 commentaires:
Enregistrer un commentaire