EOM 4 Task 1

Regarding the "Definition" portion of the RCD Tool: I am having a tendency to not only explain the scope of the risk, but also include possible consequences from the risk. For instance, "Definition" portion of a Natural Disaster risk, I say "Infrastructure is destroyed both on MG property and in the rest of the region, resulting in fewer tourists and requiring rebuilding of infrastructure." Is that too much information for the definition? Do you think they would fail me for putting too much into that box?



Thanks.

EOM 4 Task 1